Which best analyzes the authors effectiveness in “the date of infamy”? a. the author is very effective, because he explains the events that led up to pearl harbor in examines how affected world politics. b. the author is somewhat affective; he explains why the attack was important but does not elaborate on how it led to america’s involvement in world war ii. c. the offer is not effective; he fails to include the perspectives of japanese attackers and is not achieve a balanced view of the pearl harbor attacks. japanese attackers and does not achieve a balanced view of the pearl harbor attacks d. the author is somewhat effective; he could have made the text want to change by and clean some interesting characters