Opposing argument in a formal debate are put forward as

The correct choice is Pro and Con.

Further Explanation:

Pro and con is the way of putting forward the opposing arguments in a formal debate. All the other three options are incorrect.

An opposing argument is an argument presented in opposition to the thesis statement. It does not support the thesis argument rather builds a contradiction to it. Opposing claims helps in making the argument stronger. It leaves the impression on the mind of the reader that the writer is credible and authentic. It helps the writer to place arguments of both sides. In a formal debate, the opposing arguments are stated by providing pros and cons of the issue. A formal debate refers to the type of debate or discussion in which a topic is discussed by considering both the arguments. One side of the debate stands in support of the issue, while the other side is in opposition to the topic. There are certain rules which are to be followed in such kind of debate. The pros of the topic stand in the support of the argument. The cons of the topic are the argument standing in opposition to the topic. This is one of the ways of discussion the viewpoint and agreeing on anyone.

Learn more:

1. Which statement about poetry is accurate?  

2. What is the author’s purpose in the above passage, and how does she achieve it through her organization and choice of details?  

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: English

Chapter: Opposing argument

Keywords:

Opposing argument, pro and con, argument presented in opposition.  

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)