Compare zaroff’s and rainsford’s point of view on the hunt. how does this tension contribute to the moral stakes of the story? cite evidence from the story in your response.

It could be mentioned that Rainford is portrayed as a good hunter who thinks that man is superior to animals because  preys do not have feelings and hunting might be seen as a kind of game. However, these ideas might changed when Zaroff intents to use him as a prey. After this event, they become more alike that is to say, Rainford turns into a killer by killing Zaroff´s dog and, later on, Ivan.
On the other had, Zaroff also thinks that preys do not have feelings and hunting is a game. but he applies these concepts to human, by capturing sailors and using them as preys because he considers them weak, therefore, they are preys.

Ithink the answers is a i hope it my friend message me if i’m wrong and i’ll change my answer and fix it for you