English, 02.04.2022 04:10 bchagnard2122
The following is a rough draft of a student report. It contains errors.
(1) Archaeologists were excited when they discovered a human fossil on the Island of Flores, Indonesia, in 2003. (2) Historians, scientists, and lay persons have always been fascinated with the history of human evolution. (3) They have concluded that this species may have lived on Earth anytime between 100,000 to 17,000 years ago. (4) Scientists have named this dwarf species as Homo floresiensis, although many of them commonly refer to this species as "the Hobbit." (5) Although the skeleton belonged to an adult human female, it was only 3.5-feet tall.
What is the best order of the sentences above to provide the best version of the report?
A.
(1) Although the skeleton belonged to an adult human female, it was only 3.5-feet tall. (2) Archaeologists were excited when they discovered a human fossil on the Island of Flores, Indonesia, in 2003. (3) Scientists have named this dwarf species as Homo floresiensis, although many of them commonly refer to this species as "the Hobbit." (4) They have concluded that this species may have lived on Earth anytime between 100,000 to 17,000 years ago. (5) Historians, scientists, and lay persons have always been fascinated with the history of human evolution.
B.
(1) They have concluded that this species may have lived on Earth anytime between 100,000 to 17,000 years ago. (2) Archaeologists were excited when they discovered a human fossil on the Island of Flores, Indonesia, in 2003. (3) Although the skeleton belonged to an adult human female, it was only 3.5-feet tall. (4) Scientists have named this dwarf species as Homo floresiensis, although many of them commonly refer to this species as "the Hobbit." (5) Historians, scientists, and lay persons have always been fascinated with the history of human evolution.
C.
(1) Scientists have named this dwarf species as Homo floresiensis, although many of them commonly refer to this species as "the Hobbit." (2) They have concluded that this species may have lived on Earth anytime between 100,000 to 17,000 years ago. (3) Historians, scientists, and lay persons have always been fascinated with the history of human evolution. (4) Archaeologists were excited when they discovered a human fossil on the Island of Flores, Indonesia, in 2003. (5) Although the skeleton belonged to an adult human female, it was only 3.5-feet tall.
D.
(1) Historians, scientists, and lay persons have always been fascinated with the history of human evolution. (2) Archaeologists were excited when they discovered a human fossil on the Island of Flores, Indonesia, in 2003. (3) Although the skeleton belonged to an adult human female, it was only 3.5-feet tall. (4) Scientists have named this dwarf species as Homo floresiensis, although many of them commonly refer to this species as "the Hobbit." (5) They have concluded that this species may have lived on Earth anytime between 100,000 to 17,000 years ago.
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 14:00
Both "witness to the tragedy" and "hope survives in search for katrina's missing" focus on the aftermath of hurricane katrina. however, each looks at a different time period. describe what time period each piece of journalism focuses on. then, discuss how the author's choice of time period influences the overall message of the piece. be sure to use specific details from the texts in your response and introduce your topic, develop your topic, use transitions, and provide a concluding statement. (apex)
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
How will charlie most likely change after his experience at the diner in part 2 of "flowers for algernon"? he should be kind to each person who crosses his path. he will be more sympathetic to those who are similar to the way he once was. he will attempt to the dishwasher receive the surgery he was given. he will react the same way each time he sees someone being treated unfairly.
Answers: 2
English, 21.06.2019 22:20
Using the library or the internet as a resource, locate and watch two different live production interpretations of act iii of our town. then, compare and contrast how the two interpretations represented the original play. did either of the interpretations make any changes to the original material? if so, how did it affect your experience as a viewer? did you interpret the characters any differently after watching the live productions? why or why not?
Answers: 3
The following is a rough draft of a student report. It contains errors.
(1) Archaeologists were ex...
History, 25.11.2019 22:31