Can someone help me with these 3 questions? 1) Apparently with no surprise

To any happy flower,

The frost beheads it at its play

In accidental power.

Which summary is most accurate for the stanza?

Weather is predictable.

Frost kills a flower.

Nature is violent.

Accidents happen.

2) Apparently with no surprise

To any happy flower,

The frost beheads it at its play

In accidental power.

Line three - "the frost beheads it at its play" - juxtaposes two ideas that are:

Group of answer choices

nonsensical - the line makes no sense

impossible - beheading while playing is impossible; nothing can be beheaded playfully

similar - beheads and play are both actions that anyone can do

different - beheads is violent and play is childlike

3) Apparently with no surprise

To any happy flower,

The frost beheads it at its play

In accidental power.

The first line modifies, or describes, the feelings of what?
"frost"

"flower"

"play"

"power"

1. Frost kills a flower

2. different - beheads is violent and play is childlike

3. flower

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.