How do the two examples differ in their approach to similar subject matter? O A. Example 1 helps the reader understand how Boone's slide fits into the game's larger context, while Example 2 uses emotionally
charged language to better convey the impact of the win.

B. The personal angle of Example 2 helps show the author as a
passionate fan of Miners baseball, while Example 1 offers a step-
by-step understanding of how the Miners emerged victorious.

c. Example 2 objectively presents the key events of the game without
much emotion, while Example 1 helps the reader better connect
emotionally to the excitement of the Miners' victory

D. Example 1 presents the reader with one of the game's key events,
while Example 2 is more objective and offers information such as
ticket prices and the location of the stadium.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

im not

yup its an addiction