PLEASE TELL ME FEEDBACK, THATS ALL I WANT. First and foremost, I believe that homework is not beneficial for students because it causes stress. To start, stress usually occurs in homework when there are excessive amounts of it. According to ''Students Need Less Homework'' states, '' When an overwhelming amount of homework is given out to students, it becomes less beneficial for them.'' The same text goes on by stating that when a student receives excessive amounts of homework and does not know what they are doing, it can be extremely overwhelming. Excessive amounts of homework is a major problem in schools that make students become stressed. Another example of how homework causes stress for students is by leading them to failure. In the text ''Students Need Less Homework'' shows that when a student is assigned a difficult task, the feelings of failure and shame spreads all over their mind. Students normally view difficult homework as a cause of failure which leads them to be stressed. The feelings of failure toward homework can severely harm a students' mental abilities. Homework is not beneficial since it gives off stress to students.

Please tell me feedback on how I did. Prompt is choose a side whether or not homework is beneficial for students. I chose that it is not.

I- No

R1-Stress A. Excessive amounts B. Failure

I had not start others, I am still on my first paragraph. I just want to know how I did. Argumentative writing.

your answer shall be,

a. it comes from the word rebirth.

~ satan

can you provide the possible answers

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.