subject
English, 24.01.2022 20:20 luljrjr4130

It is plagiarism because you still need to cite where you got the original idea from. 4. You copy a short paragraph from an article you found. You change a couple of words and
rearrange some words, so that it's slightly different than the original. You cite this as a
paraphrase with the author's name and do not use "quotation marks" around any parts of
the paragraph. Is this plagiarism?
5
Ed

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 17:00
What is the difference between a major and a minor character? a major character has a less important story line, while a minor character plays a bigger role in the plot. a major character plays a big role in the plot, while a minor character has a less important story line. a major character has an unimportant story line in the plot. a minor character's story line is as important and developed as the major characters' story lines.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:30
This is a dominant and controlling argument
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
Reread this portion of the excerpted text from common sense. men of passive tempers look somewhat lightly over the offenses of britain, and, still hoping for the best, are apt to call out, come, we shall be friends again for all this. but examine the passions and feelings of mankind. bring the doctrine of reconciliation to the touchstone of nature, and then tell me, whether you can hereafter love, honor, and faithfully serve the power that hath carried fire and sword into your land? if you cannot do all these, then are you only deceiving yourselves, and by your delay bringing ruin upon posterity. your future connection with britain, whom you can neither love nor honor, will be forced and unnatural, and being formed only on the plan of present convenience, will in a little time fall into a relapse more wretched than the first. what key concept about the relationship between an abusive government and its citizens does paine want readers to understand? use evidence from the text to support your response. your response should be one to two complete paragraphs.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 12:40
Question 4 of 20 2 points which best explains why the delivery of william faulkner's nobel prize speech does not support its rhetoric and purpose? o a. the manner in which he speaks does not match the confidence of the message. o b. the language is too lofty and poetic for the purpose of the speech. o c. the purpose is to congratulate, but the delivery fails in its missionn. o d. the southern accent makes it difficult for the listener to understand submit
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
It is plagiarism because you still need to cite where you got the original idea from. 4. You copy...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.05.2021 05:30
question
English, 10.05.2021 05:40
question
Mathematics, 10.05.2021 05:40
Questions on the website: 13722360