HURRY PLEASEEE!!! In his analytical essay about “The Zoo,” Jaime wrote about his own father who was a soldier in Iraq, and concluded that any child of a soldier would feel proud and wouldn’t worry much about their father’s safety. How might a peer reviewer appropriately respond to Jaime’s thinking?
“Your story is very interesting, and I’d like to hear more about your life. It’s probably more real than this story.”
“Since you are also the child of a soldier, you’re probably right about the feelings of the child in the story—the author clearly doesn’t understand.”
“Your opinion on this is not valid--every child of a soldier should feel worried about his or her parent’s safety.”
“You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though.”

Read the sentence. the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, costing only about the same as a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be printed and still look good, it made loads of money. which best revises this sentence to create a more formal style and tone? *the great wave was as cheap as buying a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be made and still look great, people started making piles of money. *the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, costing about the same as a double of noodles. since mass quantities could be produced and still look exquisite, it became highly profitable to sell. *the great wave cost next to nothing, practically the same as a double of noodles. since mass quantities could be produced and still look awesome, it became highly profitable to sell. *the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, similar to buying a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be made that still looked amazing, those who sold it made tons of money.

What are the authors purposes in writing its our world too young people who are making a difference

Write a poem that's at least 10 lines long. : )