Charges of media bias have been flying like a bloody banner on the campaign trail. Newt Gingrich excoriated the āelite mediaā in a richly applauded moment during one of the Republican debates. Rick Santorum chewed out a New York Times reporter. Mitt Romney said this month that he faces āan uphill battleā against the press in the general election.
Meanwhile, just about every new poll of public sentiment shows that confidence in the news media has hit a new low. Seventy-seven percent of those surveyed by the Pew Research Center in the fall said the media ātend to favor one sideā compared with 53 percent who said so in 1985.
But have the media really become more biased? Or is this a case of perception trumping reality?
In fact, thereās little to suggest that over the past few decades news reporting has become more favorable to one party. Thatās not to say researchers havenāt found bias in reporting. They have, but they donāt agree that one side is consistently favored or that this favoritism has been growing like a pernicious weed. Ā
Style
How biased are the media, really?
By Paul FarhiApril 27, 2012
Charges of media bias have been flying like a bloody banner on the campaign trail. Newt Gingrich excoriated the āelite mediaā in a richly applauded moment during one of the Republican debates. Rick Santorum chewed out a New York Times reporter. Mitt Romney said this month that he faces āan uphill battleā against the press in the general election.
Meanwhile, just about every new poll of public sentiment shows that confidence in the news media has hit a new low. Seventy-seven percent of those surveyed by the Pew Research Center in the fall said the media ātend to favor one sideā compared with 53 percent who said so in 1985.
But have the media really become more biased? Or is this a case of perception trumping reality?
In fact, thereās little to suggest that over the past few decades news reporting has become more favorable to one party. Thatās not to say researchers havenāt found bias in reporting. They have, but they donāt agree that one side is consistently favored or that this favoritism has been growing like a pernicious weed.
On the conservative side, the strongest case might have been made by Tim Groseclose, a political science and economics professor at the University of California at Los Angeles. Groseclose used a three-pronged test to quantify the āslant quotientā of news stories reported by dozens of media sources. He compared these ratings with a statistical analysis of the voting records of various national politicians. In his 2011 book, āLeft Turn: How Liberal Bias Distorts the American Mind,ā Groseclose concluded that most media organizations aligned with the views of liberal politicians. (Groseclose determined that The Washington Postās āslant quotientā was less liberal than news coverage in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal.)
Even with conservative-leaning sources such as the Drudge Report and the Washington Times factored in, āthe aggregate slant is leftward,ā said Groseclose, who describes himself as a conservative.
But thatās not the end of the story. A āmeta-analysisā of bias studies ā that is, a study of studies ā shows something different: When all is said and done, left-leaning reporting is balanced by reporting more favorable to conservatives. āThe net effect is zero,ā said David DāAlessio, a communications sciences professor at the University of Connecticut at Stamford.
