English, 04.12.2021 18:50 carlo123

Pls pls answer it’s important An example for each question.

1.An valid argument with one true premises and false conclusion

2.A valid argument with one true premise, one false premise, and a true conclusion

3.A invalid argument with two true premise and a false conclusion

4.An invalid argument with true premises and a false conclusion

5.A invalid argument with two true premises and a true conclusion

6.An invalid argument with two false premises and a true conclusion

7.An invalid argument with one true premise, one false premise, and a true conclusion

8.A valid argument with two true premises and a true conclusion
(Give examples for all of the 8 question. Pls answer it’s important for my exam. Only accurate answer pls)

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: bradenhale2001

A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be falseA valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.By definition, every argument with true premises and a false conclusion is INVALID. So is every argument for which we can invent a story in which the premises are true and the conclusion false. ... For either example, the logic is invalid but the premises are true. Here the conclusion is false.By definition, every argument with true premises and a false conclusion is INVALID. So is every argument for which we can invent a story in which the premises are true and the conclusion false. ... For either example, the logic is invalid but the premises are true. Here the conclusion is falseA sound argument really does have all true premises so it does actually follow that its conclusion must be true. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false. FALSE: It is possible for an invalid argument to have all true premises and a true conclusion.Invalidity is a no guarantee of a true conclusion when the premises are false. False premises can lead to either a true or a false conclusion in an invalid argument. In these examples, luck rather than logic led to the true conclusion.A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.A valid argument can have false premises; and it can have a false conclusion. But if a valid argument has all true premises, then it must have a true conclusion. ... Since a sound argument is valid, it is such that if all the premises are true then the conclusion must be true.examples If Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States, then Elizabeth Taylor must be 35 years of age or older. Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States. So, Elizabeth Taylor must be 35 years of age or older. For either example, the logic is valid but the premises are falseA valid argument can have false premises; and it can have a false conclusion. But if a valid argument has all true premises, then it must have a true conclusion. ... Since a sound argument is valid, it is such that if all the premises are true then the conclusion must be trueA valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.If Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States, then Elizabeth Taylor must be 35 years of age or older. Elizabeth Taylor must be 35 years of age or older. So, Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States. For either example, the logic is invalid but the premises are true.A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.Invalidity is a no guarantee of a true conclusion when the premises are false. False premises can lead to either a true or a false conclusion in an invalid argument. In these examples, luck rather than logic led to the true conclusion.A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. ... If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.A valid argument can have false premises; and it can have a false conclusion. But if a valid argument has all true premises, then it must have a true conclusion. ... Since a sound argument is valid, it is such that if all the premises are true then the conclusion must be true.

Answer from: Quest

may i you with anything?

Answer from: Quest

what is the question ?

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 20:10

Memories of a memory have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? if so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. new insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things. first, memory is vague. imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. most likely, you could describe the room very generally. you could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. so when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. there are lots of different kinds of "tall." second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. for example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. in effect, your brain is combining memories to you tell the story. third, your memory changes over time. it also changes the more you retell the story. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. you may have noticed this yourself. the next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. you may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? the human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture. part a and part b below contain one fill-in-the-blank to be used for all three question responses. your complete response must be in the format a, b, c including the letter choice, commas, and a space after the commas. part a: which of the following best explains why memories from childhood are unreliable? fill in blank 1 using a, b, or c. our brains add details and general knowledge to childhood memories. our brains are not as reliable as video cameras are. our brains create new stories to make the past more interesting. part b select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using e, f, or g. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using h, i, or j. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture answer for blank 1:

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 05:00

Which topic or issue would be most appropriate for a four- to five-page research paper? teen health in the us how a friend recovered from anorexia national eating disorders association teen athletes who suffer from eating disorders

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:10

Which quotation from the passage best supports the themethat humans have a natural desire to learn about theworld? "they were men. i remember the dead man's face.""at least, we make a beginning."and the magic tools are broken—but we can look atthem and wonder."but they were men who built the city, not gods ordemons.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:30

Read the following passage: he roamed from chamber to chamber with hurried, unequal, and objectless step. the pallor of his countenance had assumed, if possible, a more ghastly hue— but the luminousness of his eye had utterly gone out. the once occasional huskiness of his tone was heard no more; and a tremulous quaver, as if of extreme terror, habitually characterized his utterance. there were times, indeed, when i thought his unceasingly agitated mind was laboring with some oppressive secret, to divulge which he struggled for the necessary courage. which of the above ideas might be considered foreshadowing? he is wandering all over the chamber his skin tone is really pale his voice is quivering the narrator thinks he is laboring with an oppressive secret

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Pls pls answer it’s important An example for each question.

1.An valid argument with...

Questions