Andrea is writing an argument about wearing bike helmets, and she makes the claim that helmets are an inexpensive way to protect oneself while riding. Which piece of evidence should logically be the first that Andrea cites in support of her claim?

O In many towns and cities, wearing a bike helmet is required.

O A top-rated bike helmet costs less than dinner for two.

O Some bike helmets cost more than others, but they all do the job.

O Bike helmets can be bought online or in stores.

"O A top-rated bike helmet costs less than dinner for two."

Explanation:

      Since Andrea makes the claim that they are inexpensive, she wants to use the evidence that supports her thinking. The first one and the last one have nothing to do with price. The third one talks about some being expensive, but the second one does talk about it being inexpensive.

Have a nice day!

     I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)

- Heather

compare & contrast informative essay/speech

when speaking or writing for the sole purpose of providing information in order to give audience members a good basis for making a decision, you would present an informative speech or essay.   because you wouldn’t want to be persuading the audience by arguing for one type of exercise over the other, you wouldn’t choose a persuasive/argumentative technique.   to fairly, and without bias, present information about the pros and cons of each type exercise, a compare/contrast, informative speech/essay would be the best bet.