subject
English, 13.11.2021 03:30 livirose1514

Task 6. Read the article again. Are the statements true (T) or false (F)? (5 points)1 Paul Foot worked as a lawyer for some time after leaving university.2 His first full-time job was in Oxford.3Private Eye is published every week.4 The 2007 Paul Foot Award winner didn’t work full-time.5 The author of the article thinks that today’s newspapers print a lot of important stories. The Paul Foot AwardPaul Foot was a famous British journalist. He was born in 1937 to a famous family. Both his grandfather and uncle were politicians. He went to a public school which he hated, and studied at Oxford where he wrote articles for a student newspaper. At the time he was studying law and, although he never worked as a lawyer, he was always interested in the subject. In later years, he used his knowledge of the law to help people who were sent to prison unfairly. In 1961, after finishing his studies, he went to work as a journalist in Glasgow, Scotland. This was his first full-time job and, while there, he met workers from local factories and talked to them about their lives and jobs. From then on, he fought for workers’ rights against big businesses and the government. In 1967, Paul Foot started working full-time for the twice-monthly publication, Private Eye. This is a well-known newspaper in Britain which publishes stories other newspapers are too scared to print. Paul Foot was paid much less for this work than for his work with normal, daily papers, but he didn’t mind because he was given much more freedom to write what he wanted. He enjoyed the people he worked with and found out that he and the owner had both been to similar schools and had similar, unhappy, childhoods. He left Private Eye twice to work on different publications but, both times, he returned again to the paper he always loved best. Paul Foot won several awards. He was journalist of the year in 1972 and 1989 and he worked hard on stories which no-one else was interested in. He died in 2004, but his memory lives on. In 2005, Private Eye and another newspaper, The Guardian, started up the Paul Foot Award for journalism. Six British journalists whose work over the year has been important are chosen for the final. Five of them receive a prize of ₤1,000 and the overall winner gets ₤5,000.The winners aren’t always well-known or working for national newspapers. Although the first two winners were from The Daily Mail and The Sunday Telegraph, the third, in 2007, was a journalist on the Doncaster Free Press newspaper, a small weekly newspaper from a town in the north of England. That was for her articles on a local education organisation which cost millions of pounds but didn’t provide a good service for local students. Her work was typical of what Paul Foot thought of as a ‘real’ journalist. She shared a small office and was only on a part-time contract, but by meeting people and asking the right questions, she slowly managed to put a story together that shocked everyone who read it. These days, when newspapers are full of celebrity gossip, fashion tips and ‘news’ about the latest reality or talent show, the Paul Foot Award helps us to remember what journalism should be about. Stories that matter, stories that can change the world.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:20
Now that you have been exposed to the four major sociological perspectives and in keeping with the concept of getting to know each other; this discussion question will ask for your general opinion as to which one of the four sociological perspectives make the most sense to you. (1. functionalist perspective 2. conflict perspective 3. symbolic interactionist perspective 4. postmodern perspective) in other words which one of the four perspectives do you believe best explains why people do the things they do in our society? which one of the four perspectives best explains why you believe the things you do, and why you act the way that you do?
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 17:30
Which piece of evidence would best support reason #1? othe history of using animals for research extends asfar back as 322 bce, when early greek physician-scientists, such as aristotle and erasistratus,performed various experiments on living animals.animal research played an essential role in thedevelopment of herceptin and tamoxifen, twomedications that have already saved the lives ofthousands of women who have been diagnosed withbreast cancer.even those who believe in testing on animals when it is hnecessary for vital medical research practice what isknown as "the 3 rs-reduction, refinement, andreplacement to reduce the number of animals usedfor testing.biologists believe that chimpanzees share at least 98.4percent of the same dna as humans and gorillas shareat least 97 percent, making primates a popular andlikely choice for the testing of products intended for humans
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 22:00
On one hand, i aspire to an ivy league vocation: 1 professor of the sciences in higher education. 2 but like noble amphibians that thrive on land and in the stream, 3 i've got another world of which i like to gladly dream. 4 some say that it's abnormal; my affections are exclusive. 5 in science, they say, emotions are something quite elusive. 6 line 3 exemplifies which kind of figurative language? a) hyperbole b) metaphor c) onomatopoeia d) simile
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:00
Identify the sentence in which the underlined word or words are punctuated incorrectly. a) pam was (well prepared) for the debate. b) she had (read three quarters) of the material more than once. c) she has always been (self assured). d) the winner needs a (two-thirds) majority of the votes.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Task 6. Read the article again. Are the statements true (T) or false (F)? (5 points)1 Paul Foot work...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 24.12.2019 18:31
question
Mathematics, 24.12.2019 18:31
Questions on the website: 13722367