Analysis of artwork, the main point of the paper, and description of the work I need the answer for the body for this question kaya please answer it very nicely, please

I think it is because most Sultans were of slave descendants or slaves themselves whether if it is the sultan of Morroco Mulay Ismael son of a ghanean slave or Ahmed Bey of Tunisia son of a european slave or Sultan Suleiman son of a slave as well.

the Mamluks of Egypt slaves who took power . Hell the whole Islamic world elite were sons of slaves . And this somehow tends to make it ok because all the government employees were slaves as well. So you can say Islamic world was rules by slaves and sons of slaves . Although it is not okay.

There is little attention also due to the heavy tradition of marrying your slave and that the slave children were born free fortunately but which meant that unfortunately the demand in Islamic countries for slaves was higher.

I wonder as well if it is not also because majority of slaves were of european origins as trip to the Mediterranean was cheaper than a trip across the Sahara making black slaves more expensive than the over abundant white slave.

It is very strange because we have way more slave narratives from slaves in North Africa than we do have from America.

I believe Hollywood had a role to play ever since the serie Roots was a success. It made since 100 of films serie revolving around the trans-Atlantic slave trade depicting it in the most tear breaking way , that it is hard to imagine any slave trade worse than this.

Explanation:

to me i think class room sitting education is better. i do online school and i have not learned a think haha. when i sit in the classroom i just sit there and kind of pay attention but still i get so far ahead in the class when im doing online i have nothing else better to do but play video games and i sit in school and learn and have friends and just actually learn. when i'm doing online i sit here listing to music and get on and and look up the answers i guess that is my fault for being a cheater. but to be honest i think sitting in the classroom is better.

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.