Which of the following are objections to Ethical Relativism A
That it is not always clear to which group(s) we belong
B
That ethical relativism assumes that within each society there is only a single agreed-on moral standpoint
That ethical relativism makes it immoral to change the morality of our own culture
All of the Above
N

yah idk ether buddy good luck finding it let me know when u do find it my boi

it about a duaghter

explanation: sorry thats all i could give i cant see the passage really

so is this a rhetorical question?

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.