"Profiting on the Backs of Child Laborers" By Victoria Riskin and Mike Farrell, Co-chairs of the California Committee (South) of Human Rights Watch Please write a response in full and complete sentences and explain how Riskin and Farrell built an argument to persuade their audience that child labor in the U. S. agricultural sector is a disgrace and needs to be changed.

In your response, please analyze how Riskin and Farrell use ethos (credibility), logos (facts/data), and pathos (emotion) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of their argument using evidence from the text. Your response should NOT explain whether you agree with Riskin and Farrell’s claims but rather explain how the authors build an argument to persuade their audience. Conclude your essay by restating the main ideas in your analysis, including your evaluation of the authors’ use of rhetorical elements.

they insisted that there was not enough time to learn everything.  

explanation:

if they were going to steal the answers that is simply because they insisted that there was not enough time to learn everything.  

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

my guy how are we supposed to know

the answer is c the speaker emotions