Why are there some structural and rhetorical differences between Paine's and Henry's works?
A. Because Paine's aim was to convince the British that war was
inevitable and Henry's aim was to warn the colonists
B. Because Paine's work was meant to be read and Henry's was
meant to be heard
C. Because Henry wanted to live in the colonies after the war and
Paine wanted to go back to Britain
D. Because Henry was an uneducated man and Paine was a
professor and lawyer

this labor, by slow prudence to make mild.   c. ability to govern well

hello!

unfortunately i cannot answer your question because there is no question.

to get a fast reply and accurate results, re-post (or edit) the question to add a question.

sorry!

awnser: the oxford dictionary of quotations (oup 1970) has 66 pages of quotations

attributed to the writings of william shakespeare in which there are 2369 quotations,

which may reflect well over 5000 speeches, discussions, observations and comments

that are present in shakespeare’s work. it is largely from those speeches and discussions

on shakespeare’s 37 plays, as well as his, and others’ poems, that examples have been

taken here.

in this book all quotations from his poems and plays have been taken from various

editions of the arden shakespeare.

the writer is very much indebted to the rapid response provided by his son, henry

audley-charles , for cries of , guidance, advice and repairs to his ageing pc, that

henry provided at all hours. without this assistance over the last 3 years this book

could not have been written.

in addition, the writer is much for the kind by discussion and proof readings from

elizabeth macbeth and janet hulse; and for his knowledge of shakespeare’s plays and

poems in discussions with monsieur francis saillart; and especially for years of proof

reading, support and with this book from my wife brenda amy cordeiro. above

all, the debt i owe is to professor david price, vice provost research. he has acted as

the editor and the guide for the whole project. this has been far from easy with

changes repeatedly being made by the author and which continued after professor price

had provided all the editorial structure for this project.