Sequence of paragraphs that will make the essay most logical.
[1]
Just about everyone has heard of
Napoleon Bonaparte, revolutionary, congucror,
and, ultimately, emperor of France.
But how many have heard of Joseph
Bonaparte, one of the emperor's siblings,
the last portion of his life, lived out
1. A, NO CHANGE
B. ultimately, emperor of France, revolutionary, and
conqueror
C. emperor of France. ultimately, revolutionary, and
conqueror
D. revolutionaty, ultimately emperor of France, and
conductor

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).

people can learn from the struggles of others.

i wouldn't know because i've never read it, but going over it it looks interesting