ANSWER FAST Read the paragraph from John F. Kennedy's inaugural
address
TIME REMAINING
01:53:57
Which statement best explains how Kennedy uses a
rhetorical technique to support his message?
To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins
we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends.
United there is little we cannot do in a host of
cooperative ventures. Divided there is little we can do
--for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds
and split asunder
He uses a logical appeal to explain why the United
States will promote democracy worldwide.
O He uses parallelism to reach out to different
countries around the world,
He uses repetition to emphasize change on the
horizon for people who are struggling.
O He uses a false dilemma to contrast the worldwide
impact of democracy and communism
To those new states whom we welcome to the ranks
of the free, we pledge our word that one form of
colonial control shall not have passed away merely to
be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not
always expect to find them supporting our view. But
we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting
their own freedom-and to remember that, in the past,
those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of
the tiger ended up inside.
Mark this and return
Save and Exit
Next
Submit

Create a well-crafted essay of 1-2 pages outlining a likely theory of king tutankhamun’s death at the age of nineteen. your goal is to convince peers your age that this is the most reasonable theory according to the evidence. incorporate the subjunctive and conditional moods within your writing. use the following rubric to guide your writing. remember to check your spelling (by using a spell checker and also against the original text) to ensure the proper spelling of names and places in king tut’s world. reminder: spell checkers are great, but they’re not always right. think about terms specific to egypt or even tutankhamun’s name. a spell checker won’t know if you’re spelling these correctly, so check with the reading to keep consistent. rubric criterion exceptional capable developing beginning points earned ideas & content main claim supporting details sources are cited clear, focused, interesting ideas with appropriate detail, sources are cited evident main idea with some support which may be general or limited, sources are mentioned main idea may be unclear; supporting detail is vague or off topic, some source information used central idea or theme is not stated; supporting detail may be nonexistent, no sources mentioned organization structure (claim/counterclaim) introduction conclusion strong organization; seamless paragraph transitions; effective and engaging intro and conclusion organization is appropriate but conventional; attempt at introduction and conclusion attempts at organization, inappropriate use of lists or bullets; introduction and conclusion are not developed no introduction or conclusion; no clear organizational framework or transitions voice personality sense of audience appropriate to audience; expressive, engaging, sincere voice is appropriate to topic, but inconsistent or dry voice may be inappropriate; writing may seem mechanical writer’s voice is inappropriate or nonexistent word choice precision effectiveness imagery broad range of descriptive words; creative examples, vivid details and images language is functional and appropriate; descriptions may lack detail or be overdone words may be correct but simplistic; no attempt at detail, description, or examples word choice is limited, words are often misused; supporting detail and examples are nonexistent sentence fluency rhythm, flow variety easy flow and rhythm; good variety in length and structure sentences are appropriate but lack variety and length awkward phrasing and structure, similar patterns and choppy language sentences are incomplete or difficult to follow, language is confusing conventions age appropriate spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar strong use of correct conventions; errors are few and minor most writing conventions correct; occasional high profile errors frequent errors; most do not interfere with readability frequent errors interfere with readability