subject
English, 08.07.2021 19:20 jeffyisdrunk

“Not all the treasures of the world, so far as I believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for I think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to 'bind me in all cases whatsoever' to his absolute will, am I to suffer it? What signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? If we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.” Which is the clearest and most objective summary of the excerpt?
Paine declares that it will take all the money in the world to convince him to support this war. He asks what difference it makes who his opponent is or what crime he commits. In either case, Paine asserts that he must be punished.
Paine says that war is terrible, and ordinarily nothing could have convinced him to support it. However, he also believes that if a person or group commits severe crimes against him, that party should be punished, no matter who they are.
Paine's claim that no amount of money could induce him to wage war is self-serving, but he argues rightly that anyone who threatens his safety or the safety of his family should be punished.
All the treasures of the world could not have induced me to support an offensive war, for it is murder; but if a thief threatens to kill me or my family should I suffer it? Does it matter if it is a king, a common man, my countryman or not? Should I punish one and pardon the other?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 03:40
Which statement best describes the effect of the metaphor on the excerpt's meaning? o a. it compares the sloshing liquid to a river of water able to push apart the sidewalk o b. it makes the frozen crystals seem like friends to the city to contrast with what a deceitful foe they are. o c. it compares the frozen crystals to delicately lacy snowflakes having arn unexpected strength o d. it likens h20 molecules to hexagonal crystals, which are actually larger than people imagine.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:30
Ineed writing a persuasive essay about why parents should vaccinate their kids
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:40
26 read this paragraph (1)they married within three years. (2)larry and kellie met on a ski trip (3)now, they are celebrating their twenty-fifth wedding anniversary (4)they clicked immediately which option places the sentences in a logical order? 0 o a. 2, 1.43 0 b. 2, 4, 1,3 0 2,4,3,1 0 2.1.3.4 reset next
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:30
Both wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea and spiegelman’s maus relate events of the holocaust from a jewish survivor’s perspective. using the third-person point of view. by retelling the experiences of friends. through the eyes of their fathers.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
“Not all the treasures of the world, so far as I believe, could have induced me to support an offens...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 21:10
question
Chemistry, 06.01.2021 21:10
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 21:10
question
History, 06.01.2021 21:10
Questions on the website: 13722362