1. Choose a film you have seen that has been adapted from a written work. Analyze the differences between the two versions, and argue which is better and why. You may decide for yourself what "better" means, but make sure that the standards you use to compare the two versions are clear and consistent. Support your argument with evidence from both versions. (10 points)

The brother of a presidential candidate writes an editorial in which he defends this candidate against charges of corruption. in such a circumstance, it is most appropriate for the reader to a) suspect that the candidate may have been framed. b) consider whether the candidate has the best family or not. c) wonder if the writer may be biased, due to his family connection. d) wonder if the writer may be inaccurate, due to wanting to get people to read his column. \