What do you think? Should schools continue to use To Kill a Mockingbird to teach lessons about conflict and tolerance? Are its lessons universal and able to stand
the test of time?
Use the RAFT strategy to develop an argument defending or challenging the use of
the novel To Kill a Mockingbird in your high school curriculum.
Role: Student
Audience: Parent, teacher, censor, administrator, school board member
Format: Letter, speech, or email
Topic: Whether or not the novel To Kill a Mockingbird should be part of the high
school curriculum
As you write your argument, be sure to do the following:
Start with a claim defending or challenging the use of To Kill a Mockingbird in our
high school curriculum.
Include three examples to support your claim, using specific conflict examples from
the novel as well as the real-world to substantiate your point.
(Using 5 paragraphs)

I think it is not sufficient

Explanation:

Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird is one of the classics of American literature. Never out of print, the novel has sold over 40 million copies since it was first published in 1960. It has been a staple of high school syllabuses, including in Australia, for several decades, and is often deemed the archetypal race and coming-of-age novel. For many of us, it is a formative read of our youth.

c.caliberate the new thermometer and begin the experiment again

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.