Pls help me pls The authors of “ The Last Wilderness Preserve” and “A New Land Of Opportunity” make different arguments about how people should treat Antarctica. What argument does each author make? How do they support their claims? What makes one argument stronger than the other? Use details from both essays to support your response.

In your response, be sure to
Describe each author’s argument
Explain how the authors support their claims
Evaluate what make one argument stronger than the other
Use details from both texts to support your response

The book teachese you about love

Explanation:

the correct answer is b. in order to explain a point clearly in an essay, it is always better to include a clear example of your ideas. including an scenario in which a family is affected by consumerism will support your argument as well as supporting details, such as quotations from experts and statistics. option a could be correct, but statistics and quotations are supporting ideas rather than clear explanations. choices c and d are simply inadequate. they do not add information about the effects of consumerism, rather they are strategies for engaging the reader

sorry, i just really need points. and to this question, maybe i know the answer. but i have no time now. d