subject
English, 11.06.2021 02:00 mxddisonxo

The fact is that intermarriage and interdining are not necessary factors in friendship and unity though they are often emblems thereof. But insistence on either the one or the other can easily
become and is to-day a bar to Hindu-Mahomedan Unity. If we make ourselves believe that
Hindus and Mahomedans cannot be one unless they interdine or intermarry, we would be
creating an artificial barrier between us which it might be almost impossible to remove. And it
would seriously interfere with the flowing unity between Hindus and Mahomedans if, for
example, Mahomedan youths consider it lawful to court Hindu girls. The Hindu parents will not,
even if they suspected any such thing, freely admit Mahomedans to their homes as they have
begun to do now. In my opinion it is necessary for Hindu and Mahomedan young men to
recognise this limitation.
I hold it to be utterly impossible for Hindus and Mahomedans to intermarry and yet retain intact
each other's religion. And the true beauty of Hindu-Mahomedan Unity lies in each remaining
true to his own religion and yet being true to each other. For, we are thinking of Hindus and
Mahomedans even of the most orthodox type being able to regard one another as natural
friends instead of regarding one another as natural enemies as they have done hitherto.
Read the excerpt and answer the question that follows.
What does the excerpt say?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
In addition to academic and extracurricular achievements in school, i am an involved member of my community. i volunteer at the local animal shelter every saturday morning, and i build houses for a nonprofit organization a few times a year with my family. which of these rhetorical devices is most clearly used here? a. inductive logic b. ethos c. parallelism d. text structure
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:10
Which statement is true of the antagonist of a character vs. nature conflict? the antagonist is generally more powerful than the protagonist. the antagonist is a person or personified object. the antagonist and the protagonist have the same values. the antagonist is always difficult to fletermine.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:30
Explain what john proctor meant here! then who will judge me? god in heaven, what is john proctor what is john proctor? i think it is honest, i think so, i am no saint let rebecca go like a "
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
In a 10-12 sentence response-style paragraph, explore the degree to which you agree or disagree with faulkner’s message. “i believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. he is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. the poet's, the writer's, duty is to write about these things. it is his privilege to man endure by lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past. the poet's voice need not merely be the record of man, it can be one of the props, the pillars to him endure and prevail” (faulkner 773-775).
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The fact is that intermarriage and interdining are not necessary factors in friendship and unity th...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.06.2020 22:59
question
Mathematics, 02.06.2020 23:00
Questions on the website: 13722360