Land Resources Project: Land Resource Comparison 100points and branliest if you doit wrong i will delete youare answear

When we think about environmental impact, it is obvious that solar power is a more favorable resource than fossil fuels which release nitrogen into the air causing air pollution. With reference to reliable application, coal and natural gas have the edge. The best way to compare solar energy to fossil fuels is by price, solar has quickly caught up with its nonrenewable counterparts. Comparing the cost of different energy sources can be very complicated. Government grants are a big part of shaping the growth potential for a new power source, this means that making a comparison of the costs of solar energy vs. fossil fuels side by side is a complex task that requires a great amount of energy.

Classification of land is “a process which assigns each body or tract of land in an area to its proper class in a system of classes. The classes in the systems are defined in terms of the qualities or characteristics with which the classification is concerned.” In India, the classification of land has had its roots in agricultural statistics.

The comparison list of solar energy vs. fossil fuels is not a surprise to many people. Fossil fuels are limited & non-renewable. Unlike Solar Energy that is renewable & sustainable in nature.  Fossil fuels do also produce harmful greenhouse gases that lead to global warming & other serious issues. Overall, Solar energy is far better than fossil fuels if we take their environmental impact into consideration. 3. Health Impacts Enormous amounts of harmful gases are produced during combustion of fossil fuels.

If we continue at the same rate, soon we will have a huge shortage of fossil fuels.  However, we can tackle the future energy problems by adopting green energy sources. Solar energy is one of the best examples of green energy.

In this essay I have tried my best to compare solar energy with fossil fuels, solar energy vs fossil fuels. I hope this helps

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

answer: b. the moon is much smaller than the earth.

explanation:

it starts off by comparing the earth and venus. it also only says one sentance about the moon which make it the odd one out. in conclusion the answer is b.