Please answer fast! I've answered all the questions already but I'm not very confident in them so anything helps! Catching Fire Final:

Question 1: Johanna Mason knocked Katniss out and cut her arm .*
Answers: 1. In hopes of killing her before Brutus got her 2. To cut the tracker out and make it look like she was already dead 3. To cut the tracker out and secure it to the wire for Beetee 4. Because she thought Katniss cut the wire

Question 2: Haymitch used the to win his Games.*
Answers: 1. Force field 2. Alliance with Maysilee 3. Blow dart 4. Alliance with the careers

Question 3: Beetee and Wiress show Katniss how to spot a in the force field.*
Answers: 1. Metal plate 2. Hole 3. Hot spot 4. Weakness

Question 4: was able to rescue Prim and Katniss's mother before District 12 was destroyed.*
Answers: 1. Haymitch 2. Gale 3. Plutarch 4. Finnick

Question 5: Peeta's life is saved from the monkey's by .*
Answers: 1. Johanna 2. Wiress 3. District 6 woman 4. District 11 woman

Question 6: walks into the fog to save Peeta's and Katniss's lives.*
Answers: 1. Mags 2. Morphing woman 3. Finnick 4. Johanna

Question 7: Peeta gives Katniss a (n) he finds.*
Answers: 1. Diamond 2. Opal 3. Locket 4. Pearl

Question 8: Katniss believes the leader of their revolution should have the gift of .*
Answers: 1. Speech: to move the crowd with their words 2. Strength: to defeat the enemies 3. Power: to overtake the capitol 4. Killer instinct: to know your enemies

Question 9: Finnick hears voice screaming in the jabberjay section of the arena.*
Answers: 1. Katniss's 2. Prim's 3. Annie's 4. Mag's

Question 10: Katniss's first gift in the arena is .*
Answers: 1. Medicine for their skin 2. Rolls from District 4 3. A spile 4. Sauce for the oysters

Read the passage from animal farm. as clover looked down the hillside her eyes filled with tears. if she could have spoken her thoughts, it would have been to say that this was not what they had aimed at when they had set themselves years ago to work for the overthrow of the human race. these scenes of terror and slaughter were not what they had looked forward to on that night when old major first stirred them to rebellion. if she herself had had any picture of the future, it had been of a society of animals set free from hunger and the whip, all equal, each working according to his capacity, the strong protecting the weak, as she had protected the lost brood of ducklings with her foreleg on the night of major's speech. instead—she did not know why—they had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind, when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after confessing to shocking crimes. there was no thought of rebellion or disobedience in her mind. she knew that, even as things were, they were far better off than they had been in the days of jones, and that before all else it was needful to prevent the return of the human beings. whatever happened she would remain faithful, work hard, carry out the orders that were given to her, and accept the leadership of napoleon. but still, it was not for this that she and all the other animals had hoped and toiled. it was not for this that they had built the windmill and faced the bullets of jones's gun. such were her thoughts, though she lacked the words to express them. what was most likely orwell’s purpose for writing this passage? to show that clover is more sensitive to violence than the others to remind readers of major's speech and the original rebellion to present napoleon as a cruel leader unworthy of the animals’ support to represent misled followers and their dashed hopes for better lives

Plagiarism quiz read both the paragraph below and the information following it that identifies the source using the american psychological association format. then read each of the numbered statements and determine if each is plagiarized or not. circle “yes” if the statement is plagiarized, “no” if it is not, and then fix the “yes” answers). original source the presence of the taiwanese on everest was a matter of grave concern to most of the other expeditions on the mountain. there was a very real fear that the taiwanese would suffer a calamity that would compel other expeditions to come to their aid, risking further lives, to say nothing of jeopardizing the opportunity for other climbers to reach the summit. but the taiwanese were by no means the only group that seemed egregiously unqualified. camped beside us at base camp was a twenty-five-year-old norwegian climber named peter neby, who announced his intention to make a solo ascent of the southwest face, one of the peak’s most dangerous and technically demanding routes—despite the fact that his himalayan experience was limited to two ascents of neighboring island peak, a 20,274-foot bump that required little more than vigorous walking. krakauer, j. (1998). into thin air: a personal account of the mount everest disaster. new york: anchor books, 122 - 3. student samples yes 1. there was a very real fear that the taiwanese would suffer a calamity that would compel other expeditions to come to their aid(krakauer, 1998). no) 2. many climbers overestimate their abilities, as krakauer (1998) explains when he writes of peter neby, whose himalayan experience in the past “required little more than vigorous walking” (122 - 3). no 3. jon krakauer (1998) discusses other concerns besides those of unpredictable weather and his own climbing group’s capabilities. for example the existence of a taiwanese group on everest was a matter of serious unease to most everyone else on the mountain. yes/no 4. krakauer (1998) states that the taiwanese group was not the only inexpert climbers to attempt mt. everest: camped beside us at base camp was a twenty-five-year-old norwegian climber named peter neby. . [whose] himalayan experience was limited to two ascents of neighboring island peak, a 20,274-foot bump that required little more than vigorous walking (122 – 3). yes/no 5. the author asserts that the taiwanese “were by no means the only group that seemed egregiously unqualified.” yes/no 6. in his book into thin air, jon krakauer (1998) discusses many of the dangers he noted prior to his disastrous attempt to climb mt. everest in 1996. among them were encounters with other groups and individual climbers who were ill-trained and ill-equipped to handle the demands of such a climb.

How did rick respond to this conflict