CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME I REALLY NEED IT ASAP The Allosaurus was a creature that other dinosaurs would flee from, and if you saw this dinosaur, you would probably run away from it, too. Allosaurus means "different lizard" in Greek. It was named "different lizard" because its spine was different from other dinosaurs' spines. Because the Allosaurus liked to eat other dinosaurs, it had large, powerful jaws that contained long, jagged, and sharp teeth. These teeth were measured to be up to 4 inches long! Like the Tyrannosaurus rex, the Allosaurus had two powerful legs, a massive head, a short neck, a long tail, and short arms. The arms had three-fingered hands with large, eagle-like claws. These claws were up to 6 inches long! The Allosaurus grew to be up to 38 feet long and 16.5 feet tall. Its most unique feature was a pair of blunt horns, just above and in front of the eyes.

Which is the best summary of this paragraph?
A.
The Allosaurus was a large, fierce dinosaur. It ate other dinosaurs and had a body similar to the Tyrannosaurus rex. It had a different spine from other dinosaurs and had a pair of horns above the eyes.
B.
The word Allosaurus means "different lizard" in Greek. The Allosaurus got this name because its spine was not like most other dinosaurs' spines. The Allosaurs had teeth that measured up to 4 inches long.
C.
The Allosaurus had two powerful legs and two very short arms. The hands had only three fingers, but each finger had very sharp claws, like an eagle. The claws could be as much as 6 inches long.
D.
A grown Allosaurus could be up to 38 feet long and 16.5 feet tall. The claws on its three-fingered hands could be up to half a foot long. It had very long, sharp teeth that could be up to 4 inches long.

A

Explanation:

I believe it's A. A is the only answer that talks about most things that were mentioned in the passage, if that makes sense. The other answers are talking about specifics.

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.