Read the excerpt from "Everest Then and Now." Most climbers train a lot before attempting to climb Everest. They train to improve their physical condition. The most common ways to train Include weightlifting. You need to have good endurance, stamina, and strength to climb Everest. They also need to buy equipment, including boots and clot attach to boots are necessary to prevent slipping. Having an ice ax also makes climbing easier. Ski goggles protect the eyes from high winds and blu lightweight pots are needed for cooking on the mountain. An outdoor GPS receiver is also necessary so that climbers can be located if they get stuc the mountain called Khumbu Icefall. This area contains shifting ice and deep crevasses. Special ropes and ladders are needed to cross this area. Clin bridges across gaps in the snow and ice. Some climbers bring their laptops, phones, and cameras to document their journey to the peak. Believe it How would the information be different if the excerpt were told from a first-person point of view? (1 point) The author might compare and contrast the equipment that was used in the past and how it has been improved today. The author might discuss what he or she has in his or her personal pack and which items he or she thinks are most important. The author might include the names of companles that make the special equipment and include data about the costs of these materials. O The author might select one type of special equipment and explain in more depth what it is made of and how it is used by climbers.​

she could put on music that makes her sleep

do you have any answer choices ? ?

explanation:

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.

if i was falling raindrop:

1. land safely (pretty sure that’s a tough one)

2. wished that time slowed down

3. a beautiful ending