Which of the following sentences does not adhere to the rules of parallelism for items in a series?
A. The lawyer argued her case, called witnesses, and won the
lawsuit
B. The lawyer ran to the courthouse, was wondering about her case,
and eventually decided to eat lunch.
C. The lawyer carried a briefcase, a pen, and a tape recorder to the
interview.
D. The lawyer, the mailman, and the doctor ate dinner together.

Explanation:

because im swag :)

The answer is B

Not sure what that other person is on but I think I want some...

explanation: use this website and look at the examples to form your own poem : )

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)