As used in paragraph 3, the phrase "building bridges" shapes meaning to the speech by O Acknowledging the bridge Chairman Aarvik built to allow people affected by the Holocaust to
travel between countries.
O Exemplifying the effort it takes to find common ground between groups of people.
O Demonstrating the strength and commitment it takes to find forgiveness against others for the
hateful acts they've committed against humankind.
Showing the generosity of others who are willing to help repair infrastructures destroyed in
battles that took place during World War 2.

Refute it, showing why it is mistaken—an apparent but not real problem; acknowledge its validity or plausibility, but suggest why on balance it's relatively less important or less likely than what you propose, and thus doesn't overturn it; concede its force and complicate your idea accordingly—restate your thesis in a more exact, qualified, or nuanced way that takes account of the objection, or start a new section in which you consider your topic in light of it. this will work if the counterargument concerns only an aspect of your argument; if it undermines your whole case, you need a new thesis.

Can you provide the categories and list?