In “Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Future of U. S. Space Exploration After Curiosity," Tyson develops an argument about the importance of government space programs. Identify his main claim and the reasons and evidence he uses to support it. Then, explain whether you think Tyson’s argument is effective, analyzing whether his reasons are logical and his evidence is relevant.(3-5 sentences) Helpful hints: Recall that a claim is the idea that someone is trying to prove. What claim does Tyson make about government-funded space programs?

Consider the evidence Tyson uses to support his claim. Identify some details that relate to his claim, and think about whether or not they are relevant and sufficient enough to convince you to agree with him.
Consider Tyson's reasoning. Is his logic sound and convincing? Why or why not?