English, 11.05.2021 18:50 vlonejd43

Need a thesis statement on the assassination of JFK, Be persuasive

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

90% of people marry there 7th grade love. since u have read this, u will be told good news tonight. if u don't pass this on nine comments your worst week starts now this isn't fake. apparently if u copy and paste this on ten comments in the next ten minutes you will have the best day of your life tomorrow. you will either get kissed or asked out in the next 53 minutes someone will say i love you

Explanation:

Answer from: lilytimpsonx

The John Fitzgerald Kennedy assassination is one of the most tragic events to have happened in the American history. JFK was one of the most loved Presidents due to his unique qualities that endeared him to many. “His lively family, his winning personality and his tireless energy and the respected courage in time of decision” (Stockland 102). Those were attributes that the American populace held about JFK. John Fitzgerald Kennedy was the 35th president of the United States further doubling as the youngest and first Catholic President. It is his unique nature that pre-empted impediments towards his presidency. Shock was what befell the whole world on his assassination. It was during the peak of US involvement in Vietnam and heightened Cold War between the Soviet Union and America. To fully comprehend the full picture it is important to note the status quo at that time between the United States, Germany, Cuba, and Russia (Soviet Union). The assassination came at a critical time when the Kennedy regime was cementing its national and foreign policy (Poe and Kaiser 31).

President Kennedy was felled by a sniper’s bullet on November 22, 1963 as his motorcade rode through the Dealey Plaza streets in Dallas, Texas. Within six seconds, three shots were fired at the youthful president as he was seated in his open limousine. The then Texas Governor John Connally was also wounded in the process but luckily enough, the two leaders’ wives, Jacqueline Kennedy, and Nellie Connaly escaped unscathed. The President was rushed to the Parkland Memorial Hospital where he was soon pronounced dead.

Commissions of Inquiry

The shots were identified to have emanated from a nearby warehouse. Hours after the shooting police arrested one Lee Harvey Oswald, a warehouse employee, who also happened to be a former marine with links to the Soviet Union. Oswald was however was also killed by a Dallas resident known as Jack Ruby (Livingstone 56). All these dramatic events made many people ponder whether a conspiracy was at play. A commission was established by Kennedy’s successor, President Lyndon B. Johnson, to investigate the assassination. The commission was chaired by Earl Warren the then Supreme Court Chief Justice. After ten months, the commission came to a few conclusions regarding the JFK assassination. It cited that Lee Harvey Oswald indeed killed the president, acting alone and also that the Dallas resident; Jack Ruby acted alone when he slayed Oswald before he could stand trial (Poe and Kaiser 66). The findings however were received with great skepticism by the American public. Many could not come to terms how the assassin acted alone and how Jack Ruby’s action was not part of a cover-up plot.

Another commission, United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) arrived at conclusions that contrasted the Warren Commission findings. The HSCA cited that the conspiracy might have been afoot in the assassination. Additionally, the HSCA pinpointed serious flaws in the original FBI investigation and the Warren report. The HSCA seemed to agree with the Warren team that “three shots were fired by Oswald, but there was a fourth shot which portended that there were two gunmen involved” (Poe and Kaiser 68). The HSCA findings were founded on acoustical information that was later disrepute. The commission, despite, its sensational claims did not identify any other group or person in the assassination besides Lee Harvey Oswald. It however exonerated Soviet Union, FBI, and organized crime from blame but could not explicitly say whether there was involvement of the groups’ individual members. The John Fitzgerald Kennedy assassination, to date, is still subject to immense debate spawning a great deal of conspiracy theories and possible alternative scenarios.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS LOVE MARK ME BRAINLIST

Answer from: Quest

bgr myujyte k6ujrykury which of the following was specifically permitted by the emancipation proclamation?

free african americans were allowed to fight for the confederacy.

free african americans were allowed to enlist in the union army and navy.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to move to the north.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to become confederate citizens.

Answer from: Quest

i got ypu

explanation:

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 15:00

Read the point that is being made and the illustration that follows it. point: gilgamesh is a courageous leader. illustration: enkidu is frightened of humbaba and wants to turn back, but he tells gilgamesh, "you go into the dreadful forest, you kill humbaba and win the fame.” which explanation best connects this illustration to the point being made? enkidu also tells gilgamesh that he “will return now to great-walled uruk” and that all men will know he has been a coward. although enkidu fears for his own life, he is thoughtless and does not necessarily fear for the lives of others. enkidu is deeply fearful of humbaba, and he strongly believes that gilgamesh has the courage and ability to defeat humbaba alone. this proves that enkidu does not believe that anyone can defeat humbaba, even if he thinks gilgamesh should at least try.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 20:10

Clearly show? ramona: anna, where does the theme seem to change? anna: according the article: "the fault lies with the fda's inability to release enough information in order to regain the public's trust. but perhaps japan is to blame as well. although there are plans to remove the spent nuclear fuel rods and build a permafrost wall around the four damaged reactors, is this really enough to recover damaged trust? " and then sato goes on to explain this statement. o a. challenging established ideas o b. using evidence to support your conclusions o c. asking clarifying questions o d. synthesizing claims into a single conclusion

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 20:10

Memories of a memory have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? if so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. new insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things. first, memory is vague. imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. most likely, you could describe the room very generally. you could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. so when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. there are lots of different kinds of "tall." second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. for example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. in effect, your brain is combining memories to you tell the story. third, your memory changes over time. it also changes the more you retell the story. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. you may have noticed this yourself. the next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. you may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? the human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture. part a and part b below contain one fill-in-the-blank to be used for all three question responses. your complete response must be in the format a, b, c including the letter choice, commas, and a space after the commas. part a: which of the following best explains why memories from childhood are unreliable? fill in blank 1 using a, b, or c. our brains add details and general knowledge to childhood memories. our brains are not as reliable as video cameras are. our brains create new stories to make the past more interesting. part b select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using e, f, or g. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using h, i, or j. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture answer for blank 1:

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 22:00

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Need a thesis statement on the assassination of JFK, Be persuasive...

Questions