Briefly state the argument in the Point text, "There is Value in Teaching History Through Fiction" and the evidence used to support the position. Then do the same for the Counterpoint argument in "There is Danger in Fictionalizing History." Is the evidence equally
relevant and sufficient in both selections? Choose one example of a well-supported claim in each selection. What makes the support
effective? Then choose one example of a claim in each selection that is less well supported. Why is the support insufficient?

jaxsonmennessey27

jaxsonmennessey27

in the secret life of walter mitty, the main character leads a dull life, or so he thinks.in all his daydreams he plays the role of some hero or a man who is unbelievably resourceful.whether a pilot, a surgeon   or even a criminal, he is better, so much better than all the rest of the characters in his delusions.he comes up with ideas nobody else could have conceived .when he comes back to reality, whatever he has to deal with seems silly, boring without any motivation to deliver.

in a sound of thunder a hunter,eckles, wants to use a time machine to go back in time to catch a tyrannosaurus rex. by then, 2055 elections were go held and a   new hitler was beaten by a far better candidate, keith.once he and other men have traveled,   he gets cold feet. he in   some way has known   this is not a good idea.he hears this sound , too strong for him to put up with . hopeless, he abandons the project making a mistake - another one as the first is to travel in time-that causes a butterfly effect when he comes back. in the end , changes reality for worse; the anti human anti christ deutscher,   is the president.

i don’t know the story but to answer the fiest question about theme and   subject . theme is a debatable opinion about a subject while the subject is a topic the author deside's to stick with and use through out the book and in his/her writing

im pretty sure the answer is a