Robert Nozick, a philosopher, asked people to imagine what he calls an “experience machine”— a machine capable of giving a person any set of experiences they desire by directly stimulating their brain. He offers two choices: to continue living the life we have, or give it up completely in exchange for experiencing any kind of life we want in the experience machine. What would you choose? What do you see as the pros and cons of both choices?

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

answer: metaphor: because there is a comparison between the treasures spread on the ground and the evil seed of adam drifting from the shoreline  

explanation:

he thought hans was leaving

at least thats what i think it is

sorry if wrong

particulars about treasure island, from the beginning to the end, keeping nothing back but the bearings of the island, and that only because there is still treasure not yet lifted, i take up my pen in the year of grace and go back to the time when my father kept th

explanation: