The Lion, the Fox, the Jackal, and the Wolf One day, Lion was hungry and decided to go out hunting. The Fox, the Jackal, and the Wolf knew Lion was a great hunter. So they asked if they could come along. Lion didn’t need their help, but he said they could follow him.

Soon, they came upon a large deer. They worked together and soon took its life. Then Lion commanded, “Cut this deer in four parts for me.” The other animals immediately fell to the job of skinning the deer and dividing the meat into four equal shares.

When the Fox, Jackal, and Wolf had finished their long labor, Lion said, “The first quarter is for me because I am the King of the Beasts. The second fourth is also for me because I am the one who decided to go hunting and also led this hunt. The third quarter is mine because it is only fair that I receive a quarter for my part in the chase. As for the fourth quarter, I must ask which of you dares to lay his paw on it?”

“Harrumph!” said the animals to themselves as they walked away from Lion and the deer. But they spoke in very low voices indeed.

The Lion, the Bear, and the Fox

One day, when Lion was hungry and out hunting, he spotted a baby goat. What he did not know was that Bear was hungry and out hunting, and Bear spotted he baby goat at the very same instant. Although they came from different directions, both Lion and Bear fell on the goat at the same time.

It was not a big problem to kill the small goat. But Bear and Lion went on and on fighting each other for possession of the goat. Finally, after a long battle with no true winner, they fell into an exhausted heap.

At that moment, Fox came by. He saw Lion and Bear on the ground, side by side, with the goat in the middle. He studied the scene for a few minutes, making sure that Lion and Bear were as tired out as he thought they were. Then he made a fast dash for the goat. He picked it up and carried it off.

“Harrumph!” the Lion said. “We have gone to all this trouble and fought so hard only to serve dinner to a fox.”

How are these two stories similar?

The lion takes all.
Something is stolen.
A hunt takes place.
The fox takes all.

it wants you to read whatever it gave you. then compare it to the others you read. you need to use textual evidence, and cite anything you do!

hope this !

~courtney

all: 19,619

monthly: 467.14

step-by-step explanation:

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this