How does the setting of the afterlife in "Sayadio in Spirit-land" differ from that in "Valhalla: Hall of the Chosen Slain"?

In "Sayadio in Spirit-land," the afterlife is based on reflection and gratitude, while in "Valhalla: Hall of the Chosen Slain," it is based on punishment.

In "Sayadio in Spirit-land," the afterlife is pleasant and celebratory, while in "Valhalla: Hall of the Chosen Slain," it is a place where warriors reenact battles.

In "Sayadio in Spirit-land," the afterlife is full of anguish, while in "Valhalla: Hall of the Chosen Slain," it is calm and peaceful.

In "Sayadio in Spirit-land," the afterlife is serious and sad, while in "Valhalla: Hall of the Chosen Slain," it is a place of happy memories.

which of the following was specifically permitted by the emancipation proclamation?

free african americans were allowed to fight for the confederacy.

free african americans were allowed to enlist in the union army and navy.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to move to the north.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to become confederate citizens.

ojx svdskn ertop fgowkbg9up3 rhg9uornbir

answer: c

explanation:

answer: buck is a dog living a charmed life on the estate of judge miller, during the time of the klondike gold rush in 1897. he is the king of all the animals on the estate and as such enjoys special privileges, such as the run of the estate and the admirable position of being the judge's favorite dog.

this all ends the day he accompanies manuel on a walk through the orchard to a flag station, where manuel sells him to a stranger. manuel sells buck, because he has gambling debts he needs to pay and a family to support.

this one act changes buck's life irrevocably. it is the catalyst for the rest of the story about buck and his transformation from domestic pet to wild animal.

explanation: read thoughroly ! and u will find your answer and the mean time i will be keeping my eye on you !

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.