Write a critical review in which you state, explain, and support your understanding of the character of Uncle Marcos. In your view, is Uncle Marcos a dreamer, a crackpot, an innovator, a phony, just an unusual person, or something else? Your critical
review should include the following elements:
1. A main claim in which you state your position about Uncle Marcos
2. An explanation of specific ways in which author Isabel Allende shows what Uncle Marcos is like
3. Evidence, including quotations from the narrative, that supports your main claim
4. Reasons that clarify your claim or show why it is valid
As you write your review, be clear about the ways in which your ideas fit together. Use words and phrases that show how
one idea leads to the next, and how your evidence connects to the ideas. For example, words and phrases such as because,
as a result, and consequently show cause-and-effect relationships. Words and phrases such as like, similarly, or on the
other hand show comparison and contrast.
Your critical review should be 2-4 paragraphs in length plz help like ASAP will brainliest

When a monster in a story does not have the ability to communicate, what is the most likely result?

Marking brainliestwhy does lysander stop loving hermia and begin loving helena? the magical flower juice was accidentally put in his eyes, making him fall in love with the first person he saw. hermia acts jealous and mean, causing lysander to rethink his feelings for her. helena confides hermia's secret plan to runaway with demeetrius. the magical flower juice has the opposite effect than what was expected.

Me for the love of god. i've been working on this assignment for 3 days and i don't understand the speeches at all ive read both 4 times over and i don't understand either of them if your right i will give you brainlest (i think that's how you spell it) and 99 pts. for this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. • patrick henry’s “give me liberty, or give me death! ” speech (1775) • frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852) 1. what is the speaker’s viewpoint? what is his claim? type your answer here. (score for question 2: of 2 points) 2. what reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? type your answer here. (score for question 3: of 4 points) 3. how valid are the speaker’s reasons for his claim? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 4: of 2 points) 4. what evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? type your answer here. (score for question 5: of 4 points) 5. is the speaker’s evidence relevant and sufficient? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 6: of 4 points) 6. does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. type your answer here. (score for question 7: of 4 points) 7. what counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? type your answer here. (score for question 8: of 4 points) 8. how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 9: of 4 points) 9. write a one-paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. type your answer here.