Gladwell uses many examples from fairly recent history, such as the fall of the Berlin Wall and protest in Moldova and Tehran, yet he repeatedly returns to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Why? Does
doing so strengthen his argument by adding coherence and depth, or weaken it by relying too much on a
single example? Explain your viewpoint.

Brainliest asap and 98 points i have your knowledge, and i am as small as your fist> what am i?

Read the definitions. shear = v., to cut sheer = adj., thin soar = v., to fly at a great height sore = adj., feeling pain if you look through the curtains, you can watch the birds over the ocean. which homophones correctly complete the sentence? sheer, soar shear, sore shear, soar sheer, sore

Match the bolded words in the excerpts to their contextual meanings. unoriginal well-groomed numerous he was a gentleman from sole to crown, clean favored and imperially slim. (from "richard cory" by edwin arlington robinson) this debt we pay to human guile; with torn and bleeding hearts we smile, and mouth with myriad subtleties. (from "we wear the mask" by paul lawrence dunbar) . .if it must, these things are important not because a high-sounding interpretation can be put upon them but because they are useful. when they become so derivative as to become unintelligible, the same thing may be said for all of us, that we do not admire what we cannot understand. . (from "poetry" by marianne moore)