Which speech made a stronger use of the appeal to reason? Write two paragraphs that compare and contrast both speeches in terms of their appeals to reason Provide specific examples from the text to support your point. WILL MARK THE BRAINLIEST

the number of people with jobs in factories as unskilled workers increased.

arrowright

explanation:

it would be offer because the group is offering all at once.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.