subject
English, 17.09.2019 22:50 therealdest

In part iii of the statute, jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he then declares that infringing on the principles in the statute would violate natural law. why might jefferson have mentioned the revocability of human law? what does he gain by doing this? what might he lose? answers should be at least 150 words.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 21:30
Which sentence is the best translation of "you have displaced the mirth" broken the good meeting, / with most admired disorder"?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Which verb or verb phrase signals an inappropriate shift in mood. a) will you let b) should first change c) must attend d) will be served
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which of the following is not a fire safety precaution a; start fires with kindling or other fire starters b: check local regulations and conditions before starting a fire c: clear flammable debris away from fire area d: extinguish all burning embers before leaving
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
Which if the following can you infer about maggie?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In part iii of the statute, jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 23:50
question
Biology, 09.12.2020 23:50
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 23:50
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 23:50
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 23:50
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 23:50
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722367