Keisha is writing a research paper on the dangers of distracted driving for her social studies class. she is allowed to use two websites for her sources but one must provide factual data and research information. she finds a website set up by a mother whose son was killed in a car accident by another driver who was texting and driving. keisha locates the author's name on the website, and the site looks professional. however, the mother not only calls the other driver names, but also says that the other driver's parents did not raise him right. should she use this website as a source of factual evidence? why? a. yes, she should use the site because it will be a good resource against the distracted driver argument. b. no, she should not use the site because people who have been directly affected by something are too close to it to be objective and offer neutral facts. c. no, she should look for a website that focuses on the facts and data surrounding this issue as her fact resource. she may choose to use other information from this site for other aspects of her paper. d. yes, she should use the site because it is a credible resource. distracted drivers are terrible people, and they need to be stopped!

Which of the following is not true about using your local library as a resource while doing research? a. searching library catalogs can you narrow your topic, as well as give you ideas about what resources are available to you. b. most libraries now have searchable databases and many other resources accessible online. c. using the library as a resource is a bit more time consuming, because it cannot be done from home. d. all of the above statements are true.

Read the passage from animal farm. one sunday morning squealer announced that the hens, who had just come in to lay again, must surrender their eggs. napoleon had accepted, through whymper, a contract for four hundred eggs a week. the price of these would pay for enough grain and meal to keep the farm going till summer came on and conditions were easier. when the hens heard this, they raised a terrible outcry. they had been warned earlier that this sacrifice might be necessary, but had not believed that it would really happen. they were just getting their clutches ready for the spring sitting, and they protested that to take the eggs away now was murder. for the first time since the expulsion of jones, there was something resembling a rebellion. led by three young black minorca pullets, the hens made a determined effort to thwart napoleon's wishes. their method was to fly up to the rafters and there lay their eggs, which smashed to pieces on the floor. napoleon acted swiftly and ruthlessly. he ordered the hens' rations to be stopped, and decreed that any animal giving so much as a grain of corn to a hen should be punished by death. the dogs saw to it that these orders were carried out. for five days the hens held out, then they capitulated and went back to their nesting boxes. nine hens had died in the meantime. their bodies were buried in the orchard, and it was given out that they had died of coccidiosis. whymper heard nothing of this affair, and the eggs were duly delivered, a grocer's van driving up to the farm once a week to take them away. which detail from the passage supports the claim that this is an allegory for the great purge? the hens holding out for five days but capitulating the eggs being delivered to the grocer the protesting hens being intentionally starved coccidiosis spreading on the farm

In the following line, "so many crazed men, so much shouting, so much brutality, " what type of rhetorical feature is wiesel using to emphasize the image?