Using the library or the internet as a resource, locate and watch two different interpretations of the crucible. you may choose to view a film or live play production. then, compare and contrast how the two interpretations represented the original play by arthur miller. did either of the interpretations make any changes to the original material?

Eric Christ played an interpretation of Crucible. In this interpretation we can see that he used the work of Arthur miller as inspiration, since the two works have similarities in the way of telling the story more focused on the trials and accusations that occurred.

In addition to the interpretation of Erick Christ, he also observed the interpretation of Wade Bradford. This version is more focused on the fervent religiosity of the population that left citizens somewhat "alienated" allowing a complete hysteria to take over the city. This interpretation is more sentimental than the first.

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."