English, 17.10.2019 11:30 jayme2407

The human cloning debate is absolutely pointless and potentially devastating. so far, cloning experiments have murdered 100% of all the animals tested. do we really want humans subjected to such a dangerous and unproven science? we don't if we value human life! even if cloning does work, this technology could be abused by fans of celebrities and athletes who attempt to steal dna from their idols to produce unauthorized clones. the very definition of what it means to be human could be destroyed if a human clone were produced. don't believe in the fictionalized version of clones in movies and books. the reality would be the end of the human race. what questions should you ask when evaluating for objective reasoning? evaluate the paragraph above using those questions and list the answers. if you cannot answer the question without more information or action, list exactly what you'd need to do or find to answer the question.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

What does "absolutely pointless and potentially devastating" mean? These statements are value judgments, which means they are not universally true, but determined in relation to something.
Do you have any evidence that the 100% of tested animals were murdered?
The argument that "we value human life" is manipulative. People who advocate cloning also claim they value human life.
There is no point in supposing that cloning would be abused. The societies can create legislation to prevent potential abuse.
It is hardly provable claim that something would be the end of humanity.

Answer from: Quest

i got this from a website called shmoop. i will give you a link and i will show you half of it. hope it : )

explanation:

mrs. mallard has a heart condition, which means that if she's startled she could die. so, when news comes that her husband's been killed in an accident, the people who tell her have to cushion the blow.

mrs. mallard's sister josephine sits down with her and dances around the truth until mrs. mallard finally understands what happened. the deceased mr. mallard's friend, richards, hangs out with them for moral support.

richards originally found out because he had been in the newspaper headquarters when a report of the accident that killed mr. mallard, which happened on a train, came through. richards waited for proof from a second source before going to the mallards' to share the news.

when mrs. mallard finds out what happened she acts differently from most women in the same position, who might disbelieve it. she cries passionately before deciding to go to her room to be by herself.

in her room, mrs. mallard sits down on a comfy chair and feels completely depleted. she looks out the window and looks out at a world that seems alive and fresh. she can see the sky coming between the rain clouds.

mrs. mallard sits still, occasionally crying briefly like a kid might.

the narrator describes her as youthful and pretty, but because of this news she looks preoccupied and absent.

she seems to be holding out for some kind of unknown news or knowledge, which she can tell is approaching.

mrs. mallard breathes heavily and tries to resist before succumbing to this unknown thing, which is a feeling of freedom.

acknowledging freedom makes her revive, and she doesn't consider whether she should feel bad about it.

mrs. mallard thinks to herself about how she'll cry when she sees her husband's dead body and how much he loved her. even so, she's kind of excited about the chance to make her own decisions and not feel accountable to anyone.

mrs. mallard feels even more swept up by the idea of freedom than the fact that she had felt love for her husband.

here is the link:

Answer from: Quest

i think the answer is invented words, rhyming knack, alliteration, and, metaphor.

Another question on English

English, 22.06.2019 02:30

In the following conversation, which group discussion technique does emily most clearly show?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 04:50

Which form does a verb take when the subject receives the action?

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 09:30

Which detail should most likely be cited in a historical criticism of a literary work ? the author's use of dialogue in the literary work the impact the literary work has on modern audiences the popular cultural trends of the time when the work was written the audience that the literary work is likely to reach in the future

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 10:30

Consider the text from "machu picchu: a city in the sky” and its central idea. informational text: every year, thousands of tourists come to peru to see machu picchu. to reach machu picchu, tourists can hike along the famous inca trail. the trail covers twenty-six miles. it winds through beautiful mountains, forests, and jungle. visitors can also take a bus or train ride up to the ruins. the train takes you past miles of farmland along the urubamba river valley. above are the andes mountains. the tops of the mountains are often covered with mist. then, the train goes up a mountain on a winding road. the road climbs almost 1,640 feet. other incan ruins can be seen beside the road. most are very small compared to the city ahead. central idea: tourists enjoy visiting machu picchu in the mountains of peru. what supporting detail is most important to include in a summary of this text? people can hike the inca trail or take a train or bus to reach machu picchu. when people travel to machu picchu, they see miles of surrounding farms. people are surprised by the mist on the peaks of the andes mountains. when people visit machu picchu, they sometimes see other smaller ruins.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

The human cloning debate is absolutely pointless and potentially devastating. so far, cloning experi...

Questions