When i got to my cabin at camp, the other campers showered me with a chorus of greetings.
"i’m alex,” the red-headed boy closest to me said.
"javier,” called the boy with the glasses sitting next to him.
"miguel,” waved the boy in the corner. he was sitting surrounded by a pile of comic books.
a fourth boy, taller than the rest, walked up and shook my hand. "i’m asher. grab a bunk.”
why did the author most likely use dialogue instead of description?
to allow the plot to progress
to show how the narrator felt
to emphasize the point of view
to show who the characters are

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

the mood is annoyed. they wish sandy was there do to the job right and since they dont like they way it came out now they are annoyed.