You are researching queen elizabeth i and, as you go through the checkout line at the grocery store, you see a tabloid that claims that, although history has proclaimed that she was "the virgin queen," there is new proof that she had had a child. pitfalls in credibility?

In the case that, while you are researching Queen Elizabeth I you find a tabloid that claims that, although history has proclaimed that she was "The Virgin Queen" she had a child, this would most likely will not be considered as a pitfall in credibility.

Explanation:

Although when researching a topic or a historical person it is good to read as much information as possible, tabloid journalism is often not considered a reliable source, as it is often based on gossip, options, sensationalism and even fabricated stories. So, finding a tabloid article that proclaims that Queen Elizabeth I was not in fact a virgin and that she was a mother, will not be a strong enough source on its own to serve as a pitfall in credibility for all of the research that proclaims the opposite.

the servant does not kill the child oedipus as he was ordered to do because "he pitied the child" based on the oedipus rex story. the servant was ordered to kill the child because of the prophecy that predicted king laius' death. the king already had attempted to hurt oedipus by piercing oedipus's ankle. however, the servant did not finish the job and he rather saved the baby oedipus.

explanation:

to and without are prepositions, so a, b, and d are prepositional phrases. the adverb phrase is c, about the surprise.

explanation: