subject
English, 26.12.2019 03:31 arangoaiden71

Iwoul like a certifed answer that is the only way i would give anyone my points. and you.
thoreau’s ideas had a profound effect on a man named gandhi. gandhi, was a leader in india who worked to end british rule. he led india to independence and inspired many to non-violent forms of protest and resistance. he fought to end poverty, worked to expand women's right to vote, and built bridges between ethnic and religious groups. like thoreau, he lived simply, owned very little, and ate a vegetarian diet. in india, gandhi's form of protest was called the "non-cooperation movement." he urged indians to boycott british education systems and leave government jobs. the movement was very popular, and in part to stop its spread, the british controlled government arrested him. after a few years, he was released and became active in politics again. he inspired many to follow him on marches to protest various taxes. on one such march, thousands followed him 240 miles over 24 days to the sea to protest a salt tax. this march set the example of non-violent resistance to the government that others in the country followed. eventually india won independence from britain, in large part because of gandhi work.
what is the main idea of the bolded paragraph?
gandhi had much to lose.
gandhi was more organized than thoreau.
gandhi protested against taxes.
gandhi was willing to go to jail.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 19:00
How does the dialogue between henry and his friends? “californians tale”
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
Which of the plot elements below usually comes first in a story? climax exposition rising action resolution
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
According to warren in the brown opinion, how did conditions change between the time the fourteenth amendment was adopted and the time the supreme court considered brown v. board of education?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 13:10
Which excerpt from shirley chisholm’s speech “equal rights for women” provides support for chisholm’s analysis of how the facts justify her conclusion? `it is true that part of the problem has been that women have not been aggressive in demanding their rights. this was also true of the black population for many years. they submitted to oppression and even cooperated with it. women have done the same thing. `women need no protection that men do not need. what we need are laws to protect working people, to guarantee them fair pay, safe working conditions, protection against sickness and layoffs, and provision for dignified, comfortable retirement. men and women need these things equally. that one sex needs protection more than the other is a male supremacist myth. `it is obvious that discrimination exists. women do not have the opportunities that men do. and women that do not conform to the system, who try to break with the accepted patterns, are stigmatized as ‘‘odd’’ and “unfeminine.” the fact is that a woman who aspires to be chairman of the board, or a member of the house, does so for exactly the same reasons as any man. `as in the field of equal rights for blacks, spanish-americans, the indians, and other groups, laws will not change such deep-seated problems overnight. but they can be used to provide protection for those who are most abused, and to begin the process of evolutionary change by compelling the insensitive majority to reexamine its unconscious attitudes.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Iwoul like a certifed answer that is the only way i would give anyone my points. and you.
th...
Questions
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 19.05.2020 15:59
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 15:59
question
Biology, 19.05.2020 15:59
Questions on the website: 13722359