Service improves society, impacting the as well as those needing assistance. it means being an active participant in one's community, taking action where it can be of benefit. every person should make it a priority to serve at least two hours per week. it's an extremely important civic responsibility that is invaluable to citizens most in need. service creates improved communities where people care about each other. which sentence in this summary is not objective and not a crucial detail from the article? service improves communities, impacting the as well as those needing assistance. it means being an active participant in one's community, taking action where it can be of benefit. every person should make it a priority to serve at least two hours per week. it's an extremely important civic responsibility that is invaluable to citizens most in need.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

yes, it is ethos.

i hope this !

-maddie