In a scenario of two dazed boxers lying flat on their backs, slowly regaining consciousness, the winner of world war iii would be that country which could stand on its feet first (and so go on to win world war vi). therefore, the pentagon’s priority was to provide scientists with a way to rebuild the country as fast as possible, unimpeded by unnecessary restrictions.
which type of rhetoric is used most in this excerpt to convince readers of the author’s point of view?
a an appeal to logic
b an appeal to the author’s character
c an appeal to emotion
d an appeal to ethics

The type of rhetoric that is used most in this excerpt to convince readers of the author’s point of view is an appeal to logic

Explanation:

The type of rhetoric that appeals to logic needs to have a fundament and supporting details to be sustained, the premise that the country who can stand on its feet first will be the winner as is presented in the analogy of a pair of boxers supports the idea that this country will be a step ahead its counterpart which can make it win not only one battle but the following ones too.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.