Suppose you're writing a letter and you recall a word you'd like to use, but you don't know how it's spelled. if you wanted to look up the word in a dictionary, you should use any of the following techniques except a. looking up the word as you think it's spelled. b. using the first letter of the word and searching through all the entries under that letter. c. looking up a related word that you can spell in search of clues. d. writing the word the way you think it's spelled to jog your recall

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

the words “strangest” and “unusual” suggest that the narrator is about to tell the story of an odd or puzzling group of people.