One of these statements is the point of an argument, and the other three are support for that point. click one the statement that is the point of the argument in this group. a. elected officials could spend more time on their jobs and less on raising money. b. there should be a limit on how much can be spent for political campaigns. c. candidates eith less money would have a fairer chance of competing. d. elected officials would be less likely to be influenced by rich contributors to their campaings.

In the real world, feldman learned to settle for less than 95 percent. he came to consider a company “honest” if its payment rate was above 90 percent. he considered a rate between 80 and 90 percent “annoying but tolerable.” if a company habitually paid below 80 percent, feldman might post a hectoring note, like this one: the cost of bagels has gone up dramatically since the beginning of the year. unfortunately, the number of bagels that disappear without being paid for has also gone up. don’t let that continue. i don’t imagine that you would teach your children to cheat, so why do it yourselves? the excerpt serves as which type of support for the authors’ argument? a claim an example a conclusion a counterclaim